Open Source Sip: [OpenSIPStack] *****SPAM***** Re: last ...

14 Replies Last post: Aug 27, 2007 12:11 PM by Guest

Guest

Aug 22, 2007 8:59 PM

[OpenSIPStack] SPAM Re: last stable release?

Software zur Erkennung von "Spam" auf dem Rechner

priamus.teamware-gmbh.de

hat die eingegangene E-mail als mögliche "Spam"-Nachricht identifiziert.
Die ursprüngliche Nachricht wurde an diesen Bericht angehängt, so dass
Sie sie anschauen können (falls es doch eine legitime E-Mail ist) oder
ähnliche unerwünschte Nachrichten in Zukunft markieren können.
Bei Fragen zu diesem Vorgang wenden Sie sich bitte an

postmaster@teamware-gmbh.de

Vorschau: Hi Which version is the last stable release of opensipstack
for Linux/Centos5? This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping
through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration
files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>
http://get.splunk.com/ opensipstack-devel mailing list opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel http://...

Inhaltsanalyse im Detail: (5.8 Punkte, 5.0 benötigt)

Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
----

--------------------------------------------------
0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
0.0 DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys Identified Mail: policy says domain
signs some mails
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 40-60%
~~score: 0.4998~~
3.7 PYZOR_CHECK Gelistet im Pyzor-System (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
2.0 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel

Guest

1. Aug 22, 2007 9:49 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] last stable release?

Hi Last stable release is 1.1.4 (OpenSBC) 1.1.7 (OpenSIPStack). These
are available in the download sections. However CVS is worth a try.
We try our best to not to introduce new bugs in CVS that would affect
the previous released functionality. My advise is to go with CVS

Joegen

voice wrote:

Hi

Which version is the last stable release of opensipstack for Linux/Centos5?

Guest

2. Aug 25, 2007 4:13 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] last stable release?

Hi All

Some where in your lit i found this 'SIP egress and ingress trunking among
others'. Is there a doc somewhere that explains how to do this.

r

Guest

3. Aug 25, 2007 4:44 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] last stable release?

Hi Joegen

I have set up a public openSBC. Could this be helpful for you to use for
testing?

r

Original Message

From: "Joegen E. Baclor"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSIPStack last stable release?

voice wrote:

Hi

Which version is the last stable release of opensipstack for

Linux/Centos5?

Guest

4. Aug 26, 2007 11:50 AM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Upper Registration Routes

Hi

Is there a how to for 'Upper Registration Routes' menu option?

r

Guest

5. Aug 26, 2007 12:13 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Upper Registration Routes found it

Guest

6. Aug 26, 2007 12:54 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Upper Registration Routes

Can someone check my logic and setup?

I am using a Cisco ATA-186 in atasip 3.1.0 firmware with a public IPaddr
(69.x.x.x).

I am setting the OutBoundProxy on the ATAs' to my openSBC name/ipaddr ==
sbc.netxxxxxx.net with a public IP Address 69.x.x.50.

The ATA is registered in sipXecs 3.9.x also with a public IPaddr 69.x.x.40.

I am also using but not in this test several Cisco 26xx routers run nat/PAT.
These routers are in front several private networks. The public side of the
NAT are connected to transceivers (69.x.x.x). For testing both boxes are
hanging out on the Internet. No firewalls, Nat nothing to get in the way
etc...

I would like to also have remote Internet (outside my network) ATA/IPPhones
register to the sipXecs.

On the openSBC I have set 'Upper Registration Routes' to point to the
sipxecs. This is my string:

sip:@sbc.network.net sip:sipx.network.net:5060.

Using this approach will local and possibly the remote ATA be able to
register via the openSBC?

Using openSBC in this way do should i set SBC Mode something other then
'Full Mode'?

When using openSBC using 'Upper registration Routes' is there a basic set
of setting i should be concerned with at the exclusion of other settings?

Are there any sipXecs folks on this list with similar issues' to mine?

I would be willing to open my test sipxecs and opensbc box's to further
development challenges in exchange for help setting up both boxes to
intergrate sipXecs and openSBC....

Guest

7. Aug 26, 2007 1:09 PM

in response to: Guest

[OpenSIPStack] Internal DNS Mapping

Hi

We run our own primary and secondary DNS. with a public add of 69.x.x.x.
For security reasons we don't use the SRV feature so our pbx resolves to a
full FQDN. i.e. @sipx.network.net and not @network.net.

Will this setup interferre with openSBC resolving DNS.

Should i set openSBCs' 'Internal DNS Mapping' to our primary DNS or should i
leave it blank?

Guest

8. Aug 26, 2007 11:27 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Upper Registration Routes

voice wrote:

Can someone check my logic and setup?

I would like to also have remote Internet (outside my network) ATA/IPPhones
register to the sipXecs.

This should be possible. The trick is, the domain sip:sbc.network.net
should not resolve as the local address of OpenSBC. If
sip:sbc.network.net is a local address, then OpenSBC would try to be
authoritative over the registrations. The correct format would be:

sip:sipx.network.net* sip:sipx.network.net:5060

Using openSBC in this way do should i set SBC Mode something other then
'Full Mode'?

I am suggesting B2BUpperReg Mode. This would limit the work of OpenSBC
to b2bua and upper reg. Full mode includes the proxy functionality.

When using openSBC using 'Upper registration Routes' is there a basic set
of setting i should be concerned with at the exclusion of other settings?

No. B2BUpperReg routes are just static routes for OpenSBC to follow in
case the remote domain is not resolvable via DNS. In B2BUpperReg mode,
you don't even have to put anything in the routes as long as the To-URI
resolves to a remote domain.

Solegy (Sponsor Company of OpenSBC) has a similar setup. In fact
B2BUpperReg mode came into life when we started to evaluate sipXecs.

Guest

9. Aug 26, 2007 11:31 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Internal DNS Mapping

voice wrote:

Internal DNS Mapping is there so that you could fool OpenSBC that a
doamin is actually an FQDN even though it doesn't have a DNS record for
it. If you internal and external DNS only affects this particular
domain, I think you should use the internal DNS as with OpenSBC

Guest

10. Aug 27, 2007 9:20 AM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Internal DNS Mapping

Hi

So your advice is to leave 'Internal DNS Mapping' blank if sipX domain is a
'FQDN' on the primary DNS?

r

Original Message

From: "joegen@opensipstack.org"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSIPStack Internal DNS Mapping

voice wrote:

Hi

We run our own primary and secondary DNS. with a public add of 69.x.x.x.
For security reasons we don't use the SRV feature so our pbx resolves to

full FQDN. i.e. @sipx.network.net and not @network.net.

Will this setup interferre with openSBC resolving DNS.

Should i set openSBCs' 'Internal DNS Mapping' to our primary DNS or

should i

leave it blank?

Guest

11. Aug 27, 2007 9:33 AM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Upper Registration Routes

Hi joegen

Thank you very much.

joegen wrote

Solegy (Sponsor Company of OpenSBC) has a similar setup. In fact
B2BUpperReg mode came into life when we started to evaluate sipXecs.

How do i contact Solegy? Do they still have those test boxes available? Do
you know what version of sipX they are/were using?

r

Original Message

From: "joegen@opensipstack.org"
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSIPStack Upper Registration Routes

voice wrote:

Can someone check my logic and setup?

69.x.x.40.

I am also using but not in this test several Cisco 26xx routers run

nat/PAT.

These routers are in front several private networks. The public side of

the

NAT are connected to transceivers (69.x.x.x). For testing both boxes

are

hanging out on the Internet. No firewalls, Nat nothing to get in the

way

etc...

I would like to also have remote Internet (outside my network)

ATA/IPPhones

Using openSBC in this way do should i set SBC Mode something other then
'Full Mode'?

I am suggesting B2BUpperReg Mode. This would limit the work of OpenSBC
to b2bua and upper reg. Full mode includes the proxy functionality.

When using openSBC using 'Upper registration Routes' is there a basic

set

of setting i should be concerned with at the exclusion of other

settings?

Solegy (Sponsor Company of OpenSBC) has a similar setup. In fact
B2BUpperReg mode came into life when we started to evaluate sipXecs.

Guest

12. Aug 27, 2007 12:02 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC Registration Status

Hi

I can see from OpenSBC Registration Status this

AOR Expires Call-ID
200@69.38.187.241 sip:200@10.10.10.2:5060 845 1343322131@10.10.10.2
200@sipx.chicagonettelephone.net sip:200@10.10.10.2:5060 845
1343322131@10.10.10.2

where is the 10.10.10.2:5060 ipaddr in the expires set and why the DHCP
addressing when the openSBC is sitting on a public IP?

also where does the call-id 1343322131@10.10.10.2 number and 10.10.10.2
domain being set? It is reading some status value but from where are they
set.

r

Guest

13. Aug 27, 2007 12:08 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] B2BUA Routes

Hi

With respect to 'B2BUA Routes' settings.

if the ATA's DID is 7739050169 and the 'Upper Registration Routes' is set to
sip:sipx.network.net* sip:sipx.network.net:5060

Would this be the correct way to set B2BUA Route?

sip:7739050169.sipx.network.net:5060

Guest

14. Aug 27, 2007 12:11 PM

in response to: Guest

Re: [OpenSIPStack] Relay Routes

Hi

with respect to 'Relay Routes'

and 'Upper Registration Routes ' set to
sip:sipx.network.net* sip:sipx.network.net:5060

Would this be the correct way to setup
Relay Routes
sip:200.sipx.network.net:5060

Go to original post

Aug 22, 2007 8:59 PM

[OpenSIPStack] SPAM Re: last stable release?

Actions

More Like This

Aug 22, 2007 8:59 PM

[OpenSIPStack] *****SPAM***** Re: last stable release?

Actions

More Like This

[OpenSIPStack] SPAM Re: last stable release?