Up to Discussions in OpenSBC
3 Replies Last post: Nov 5, 2007 3:24 PM by Guest  
Guest
Guest

Nov 4, 2007 10:53 PM

[OpenSIPStack] The CSeq headers for the MESSAGE requests

I've found that every time I send the instant messages, the CSeq headers for the MESSAGE requests are always the same. I use OpenSIPStack-1.1.7-11, but I think the latest CVS should have the same behavior.

Is it normal?

I attached the .pcap file. The scenario is that I continually sent myself the message.

Regards,
GCC
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
Guest
Guest
1. Nov 4, 2007 10:53 PM in response to: Guest
Re: [OpenSIPStack] The CSeq headers for the MESSAGE requests
Hi GCC,

I don't have the chance to look at the code but this seem highly
probable. MESSAGE are sent out of the dialog. Thus there is no need
to maintain CSeq state. Transactions are identifiable via their unique
from tags. However, I think it is a good idea to increment the CSeq for
out of the dialog requests as well. I'll have this changed when i get
the chance. Thanks for pointing it out.

Joegen

Woo Chen wrote:

I've found that every time I send the instant messages, the CSeq headers for the MESSAGE requests are always the same. I use OpenSIPStack-1.1.7-11, but I think the latest CVS should have the same behavior.

Is it normal?

I attached the .pcap file. The scenario is that I continually sent myself the message.

Regards,
GCC
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.20/1107 - Release Date: 11/3/2007 11:22 AM

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
Guest
Guest
2. Nov 5, 2007 11:22 AM in response to: Guest
Re: [OpenSIPStack] Russel releases'
Hi

What is the openSipStack Russel release on sourceforge.net?

And is it up to date with the latest patches?

r

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
Guest
Guest
3. Nov 5, 2007 3:24 PM in response to: Guest
Re: [OpenSIPStack] Port 2401 on Firewall etc...
Hi Joe

I finally have a change to contribute to this effort

In your instructions for a Linux install please insert before number 1

1. Make sure to Open up port 2401 on your firewall etc...!

r

Original Message

From: "Joegen E. Baclor"
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSIPStack The CSeq headers for the MESSAGE requests

Hi GCC,

I don't have the chance to look at the code but this seem highly
probable. MESSAGE are sent out of the dialog. Thus there is no need
to maintain CSeq state. Transactions are identifiable via their unique
from tags. However, I think it is a good idea to increment the CSeq for
out of the dialog requests as well. I'll have this changed when i get
the chance. Thanks for pointing it out.

Joegen

Woo Chen wrote:

I've found that every time I send the instant messages, the CSeq
headers for the MESSAGE requests are always the same. I use
OpenSIPStack-1.1.7-11, but I think the latest CVS should have the same
behavior.

Is it normal?

I attached the .pcap file. The scenario is that I continually sent
myself the message.

Regards,
GCC
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.20/1107 - Release Date:
11/3/2007 11:22 AM
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel


This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
opensipstack-devel mailing list
opensipstack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel

Actions

More Like This